[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs snapshot tarball test build
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs snapshot tarball test build |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:45:20 +0200 |
> Cc: "djh" <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
> From: "djh" <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:32:49 +0900
>
> > > The only problem is shown below (and maybe it is not a real problem).
> > > --------
> > > ../src/emacs -batch --no-site-file --multibyte -l
> > > /usr/src/emacs-tmp/emacs-22.0.95/lib-src/../lisp/mail/blessmail.el
> > > Fatal error (6)make[1]: *** [blessmail] Aborted (core dumped)
> >
> > To me, this looks as an evidence that the Emacs binary you built is
> > unreliable. So I think we should not yet add GCC 4.1.3 to the the 3
> > safe versions of Cygwin GCC mentioned in PROBLEMS.
>
> GCC 4.1.3 (actually gcc-core-4.1-20070312.tar.bz2 and friends) does provide
> for a
> robust build from cvs though (or did on March 13th anyway.)
How can you call it ``robust'' when it crashes while loading
blessmail?