[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transpose-regions
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: transpose-regions |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:52:59 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:36:10 +0100
> Cc: Nick Roberts <address@hidden>, "Kim F. Storm" <address@hidden>,
> emacs-devel <address@hidden>
>
> > X server distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 4.90.3000
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Interesting.
What's so interesting about this? Until very recently, Emacs insisted
on printing "X server distributor" as the header of this field in the
bug report. (It now says "Windowing system distributor" instead.)
> > configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4)'
> ^^^^^
> Not quite new, either.
There's no newer GCC for MinGW. GCC 4.x has grave problems on Windows
(both in Cygwin and in MinGW) that will take time to resolve. In the
meantime, I'm happily using 3.4.2 without any problems. So I don't
see why we need to ask people to run for their lives to upgrade to the
latest and greatest.
Re: transpose-regions, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/22
- Re: transpose-regions, martin rudalics, 2007/03/22
- Re: transpose-regions, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/22
- Re: transpose-regions, martin rudalics, 2007/03/22
- Re: transpose-regions, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/22
- Re: transpose-regions, martin rudalics, 2007/03/22
- Re: transpose-regions, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/22
- Re: transpose-regions, martin rudalics, 2007/03/22
- Re: transpose-regions, martin rudalics, 2007/03/22
Re: transpose-regions, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/22