[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer.
From: |
Katsumi Yamaoka |
Subject: |
Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer. |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:24:37 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> In <address@hidden> Richard Stallman wrote:
> =2D message-user-agent, which calls `message-mail', ignores its
> SWITCH-FUNCTION and CONTINUE args and always open a new buffer.
> Isn't that a bug? Shouldn't message-mail obey these arguments?
We will have to implement them in Gnus if those arguments are
really required, although I think it doesn't solve the problem
that `sendmail-user-agent' overrides an existing *mail* buffer.
IMHO, implementing SWITCH-FUNCTION is regression. Because, in
the case that `mail-user-agent' is `gnus-user-agent', we can use
the `gnus-buffer-configuration' feature to customize how to pop
to a mail buffer up variously. The valid choices include splitting
a window, making a new frame, etc. For CONTINUE, it is hard to me
to imagine the situation where I want to use an existing *mail*
buffer in order to compose a new mail. Anyway, that Gnus users
set `mail-user-agent' to `gnus-user-agent' is the best, I think.
Regards,
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/67501
- report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer., Michaƫl Cadilhac, 2007/03/07
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer., Richard Stallman, 2007/03/11
- Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer.,
Katsumi Yamaoka <=
- Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer., Miles Bader, 2007/03/12
- Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer., Richard Stallman, 2007/03/12
- Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2007/03/12
- Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer., Richard Stallman, 2007/03/13
- Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2007/03/14
- Re: report-emacs-bug and *mail* buffer., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2007/03/14