|
From: | Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: | Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: | Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:57:57 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061207 Thunderbird/1.5.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666 |
Stuart D. Herring wrote:
Actually, a better test would be to put (if (zerop (random 1)) (setq jit-lock-stealth-time nil)) in your .emacs. And then check the value of jit-lock-stealth-time every time you notice a delay (after which, you'll want to restart jit-lock, which basically means restart Emacs). This should bring the experiment a bit closer to the "double blind" gold standard.Remember to seed your random number generator first! (random t) is your friend.
It was not necessary in this particular case but would perhaps had made obfuscation better. ;-)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |