[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: National Language Support Functions
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: National Language Support Functions |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Dec 2006 18:33:56 +0200 |
> Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:21:14 +0100
> From: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden>
> CC: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-07/msg00467.html
> >
> > and the discussion that followed.
>
> Did not I explain why that argument is not valid here?
You said:
"I would not suggest using it if I believed that."
This hardly qualifies as explaining why my argument ``is not valid''.
> If you take a look at the code you will see that very little will
> have to change to allow this hook.
What I said back then had nothing to do with how easy or hard is it to
allow your hook. I was talking about long-term maintenance burden,
not short-term amount of work.
- Re: National Language Support Functions, (continued)
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/30
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/30
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/30
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/30
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Jason Rumney, 2006/12/30
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/30
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/30
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/30
- Re: National Language Support Functions,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/30
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/30
- Re: National Language Support Functions, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2006/12/30