Re: C++ name and add-log-current-defun

[Kevin Rodgers]

Herbert Euler wrote:
> Hmmm, I think the choice of ``skip-syntax-backward'' or
> ``forward-sexp'' is not more important than adding a
> ``while'' form; both the two functions work, but without
> a ``while'' form, there is a bug.

Yes, you're right.  Somehow I forgot to actually check that in a C++ 
buffer (vs. Emacs Lisp).

But I think your while condition

        (not (looking-back "\\(^\\| \\|\t\\)"))

could be improved by specifying a LIMIT arg to looking-back

        (1- (point))

and/or by anchoring the regexp with \=.

--
Kevin Rodgers
Denver, Colorado, USA