[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs? |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Dec 2006 14:25:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> There's a problem with this: Autoconf 2.61 was only released in
> November this year, and it requires a new version of M4 (1.4.8), which
> in turn requires a new libc6. Most existing GNU/Linux distributions
> won't have these packages (at least in their "stable" branches).
>
> That's not so bad. Most users don't need to rebuild the configure
> file, so they won't have a problem.
>
> However, we could ask the Autoconf developers to release a patched
> version 2.59.1 which fixes this bug and doesn't require a new M4.
Turns out it was a Debian packaging requirement rather than a real
requirement. I have compiled autoconf 2.61 from source and checked in
a regenerated configure.
Let's hope there are no serious bugs in autoconf 2.61; it's a little
late in the release cycle to be making this kind of change.
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?, (continued)
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?, Henrik Enberg, 2006/12/23
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?, Jan Djärv, 2006/12/23
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?, Henrik Enberg, 2006/12/23
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?, Jan Djärv, 2006/12/24
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/24
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/23
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?, Jan Djärv, 2006/12/22
- Re: Should libXt-devel be required to build Emacs?, Jan Djärv, 2006/12/20