|
From: | Lennart Borgman |
Subject: | Re: Saving when the coding system can't code all buffer characters |
Date: | Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:23:43 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) |
David Kastrup wrote:
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:15:45 +0100 From: LENNART BORGMAN <address@hidden> Cc: address@hiddenI meant thatC-u C-x = at the prompt gives information about the current position in the minibuffer. Or am I wrong?You are supposed to type "C-u C-x =" in the buffer you are trying to save. To this end, you can type "C-x o" to get out of the minibuffer and to the buffer being saved, and then type "C-u C-x =".I think that is far too much to suppose from an average user. How about putting a property on the character that will highlight it and display the information on mouse-over in a tooltip?
Probably. Anyway I did not think of using C-x o here. I had no idea it worked from the minibuffer.
Maybe we should simply include the information displayed by "C-u C-x =" in the same *Warning* buffer that explains the problem. That would eliminate the need for telling about "C-u C-x =" and for an arrangement to find the problematic characters after C-g.Also an idea, but the warning is more dissociated from the buffer than a highlight and tooltip would be.
The warning stays visible afterwards and that is very good in a case like this. A highlight is also very good, but a tooltip is far to obscure IMHO.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |