Re: usr1-signal, usr2-signal, etc.

[Kim F. Storm]

YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>>> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:41:30 +0100, address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) said:
>
>> Could you please try to fix the problematic cases?
>
> I don't think I understand your whole plan to fix the
> handle_user_signal issue.  Could you explain that?

I guess the safest thing would be if the signal handler didn't
stuff the keyboard events itself.

What if the signal handlers just increment a global counter (one for
each signal type), and the main loop in keyboard.c checked those
counters and added the pending signal events in the "safe context"?

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk