[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp |
Date: |
Sat, 09 Dec 2006 21:56:18 +0900 |
martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
> Finally, if you really want to document the 9th return value you should
> talk about all its elements.
Wouldn't someone's earlier suggestion of providing an accessor macro to
extract 9th value be a tad more maintainable and make for more readable
code?
-Miles
--
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here,
beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?
- Honesty with parse-partial-sexp, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/12/07
- Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/08
- Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp, martin rudalics, 2006/12/09
- Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/09
- Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/10
- Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/11
- Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/12/12
- Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp, Stefan Monnier, 2006/12/12
- Re: Honesty with parse-partial-sexp, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/12/12