[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unicode font-backend + tiling
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: unicode font-backend + tiling |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Dec 2006 12:07:22 +0900 |
On 12/5/06, Leo <address@hidden> wrote:
I love aa too. However Chinese characters look hazy when aa is enabled.
I check Chinese characters in gedit (gnome editor); it seems it
disable aa for Chinese characters. I wonder how can emacs do the same.
By default, Emacs 23 doesn't use AA for non-ascii character sets yet
(so it just uses the old bitmap mechanism).
If I enable AA for CJK characters in Emacs, they do actually look
fuzzy[*] -- this is slightly surprising to me, since I think the
default configuration for freetype disables AA for CJK characters. So
maybe Emacs is overriding the defaults (I don't really know how that
stuff works)? If so, I assume it can be tweaked to not do that...
[*] BTW, don't think AA actually _always_ looks bad for CJK -- I've
seen some really, really nicely done examples, I think it was some
type1 cjk fonts where freetype was using the normally disabled
autohinter (disabled for some stupid patent reason).
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- unicode font-backend + tiling, Miles Bader, 2006/12/04
- Re: unicode font-backend + tiling, Leo, 2006/12/04
- Re: unicode font-backend + tiling, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/04
- Re: unicode font-backend + tiling, Miles Bader, 2006/12/04
- Re: unicode font-backend + tiling, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/05
- Re: unicode font-backend + tiling, Leo, 2006/12/05
- Re: unicode font-backend + tiling, Miles Bader, 2006/12/05
- Re: unicode font-backend + tiling, Mikhail Gusarov, 2006/12/06
- Re: unicode font-backend + tiling, Jan Djärv, 2006/12/05