[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode"
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode" |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:49:30 -0500 |
It seems that about half the people who posted something about
font-lock-support-mode are aware of jit-lock mode whereas
the other half got stuck with lazy-lock mode. My guess is that people
actively
tracking the latest CVS branch (and thus the pretest version)
are well aware of jit-lock mode and the people who have not
bothered with CVS version wrote about lazy-lock vs fast-lock and
have not updated the web pages for some time.
What would people think of making font-lock-support-mode a no-op, and
creating some new variable people can use if they really want to use
something else instead of jit-lock?
- Re: "Use font-lock-support-mode rather than calling lazy-lock-mode",
Richard Stallman <=