|
From: | Lennart Borgman |
Subject: | Re: Incorrect declarations of thread functions on w32 |
Date: | Mon, 27 Nov 2006 18:04:01 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) |
Jason Rumney wrote:
Lennart Borgman wrote:Seems like reader_thread is ok, but would it not be much easier to understand if LPVOID was used instead of void* in the argument?I don't think so. LPVOID is a macro, anyone who is not familiar with the definition that Microsoft has given it would have to search for its definition.void * is standard C.
Maybe write LPVOID to make it easier to compare and add a comment that it usually is just void* ?
But w32_msg_worker needs some fix.It was done this morning.
Thanks.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |