[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eval-when-compile vs defconst
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: eval-when-compile vs defconst |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 07:27:05 -0500 |
Surely it's there to avoid calling (and loading) `regexp-opt' at load
time, and the concat is merely along for the ride? Unless the optimizer
already evaluates calls to `regexp-opt' on quoted lists, it seems useful
to me.
Indeed, to avoid loading regexp-opt might be worth the trouble.
(The time of running it isn't significant.)
So if it succeeds in doing that, it is worth keeping.
- eval-when-compile vs defconst, Stephen Leake, 2006/11/11
- eval-when-compile vs defconst, Bob Rogers, 2006/11/11
- Re: eval-when-compile vs defconst, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/12
- Re: eval-when-compile vs defconst, Stephen Leake, 2006/11/12
- Re: eval-when-compile vs defconst, Markus Triska, 2006/11/12
- Re: eval-when-compile vs defconst, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/13
- Re: eval-when-compile vs defconst, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/11/13
- Re: eval-when-compile vs defconst, Stefan Monnier, 2006/11/13
- Re: eval-when-compile vs defconst, Markus Triska, 2006/11/14
- Re: eval-when-compile vs defconst,
Richard Stallman <=