[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs and GFortran
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs and GFortran |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:10:30 +0200 |
> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 08:06:33 +0100
> From: "Steven Bosscher" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
> >
> > Should gfortran conform to the GNU standards? Preferably yes. But
> > if no developer (volunteer!) cares to make it so, tough luck but it
> > is not going to happen.
> >
> > I volunteered.
>
> Yes, and that's really sweet of you.
And what is this if not hostility and rudeness towards a volunteer?
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, (continued)
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Brooks Moses, 2006/11/14
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/14
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Brooks Moses, 2006/11/15
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Nick Roberts, 2006/11/15
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, David Kastrup, 2006/11/15
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, David Kastrup, 2006/11/15
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Andrew Pinski, 2006/11/15
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, David Kastrup, 2006/11/15
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/16
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Steven Bosscher, 2006/11/03
- Re: Emacs and GFortran,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Richard Stallman, 2006/11/04
- Re: Emacs and GFortran, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/11/03
Re: Emacs and GFortran, Paul Thomas, 2006/11/03