Re: highlight-changes-mode

[rsharman]

Richard Stallman writes:
 > Is there an important reason to overload M-x highlight-changes-mode
 > for toggling between active and passive mode?  Would it be
 > inconvenient to make that a separate command, so that M-x
 > highlight-changes-mode could follow the conventions for minor modes?


I'm sure there's no good reason that it has to work the way it does.
I think it just "seemed like a good idea at the time",  but as you say
it isn't consistent with other modes.

I can take a look into it in a couple of days.

Richard