[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line-move-partial too costly ?
From: |
Michaël Cadilhac |
Subject: |
Re: line-move-partial too costly ? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:23:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> address@hidden (Michaël Cadilhac) writes:
>
>> Since the creation of line-move-partial, going to the next few lines
>> has become a P*TA.
>
>> Is there any solution ?
>
> I installed a small optimization -- pls try again.
>
> You could set redisplay-dont-pause to t.
AFAICT, it doesn't fix my problem. I recompiled Emacs with -O3, and
the problem remains, setting redisplay-dont-pause didn't help.
Maybe the feature provided by line-move-partial can be optional?
--
/!\ My mail address changed, please update your files accordingly.
| Michaël `Micha' Cadilhac | Mieux vaut se taire |
| Epita/LRDE Promo 2007 | Que de parler trop fort. |
| http://michael.cadilhac.name | -- As de trèfle |
`-- - JID: address@hidden --' - --'
pgpSkmp4LbDY5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- line-move-partial too costly ?, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/09/13
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/13
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?,
Michaël Cadilhac <=
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/14
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/15
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Chong Yidong, 2006/09/18
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/18
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Michaël Cadilhac, 2006/09/19
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/19
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/19
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Kim F. Storm, 2006/09/20
- Re: line-move-partial too costly ?, Miles Bader, 2006/09/14