[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: UCS-2BE
|
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
|
Subject: |
Re: UCS-2BE |
|
Date: |
Fri, 01 Sep 2006 21:57:25 +0900 |
|
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:
> Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:
> > By the way, why do people want such many variants... sigh...
> Actually, sane people only want UTF-8. :-)
Actually, UTF-8 is not that sane nowadays because it may
have BOM <EF BB BF>. I read Unicode 4.1 but it doesn't
define how to treat the heading byte sequence <EF BB BF> of
UTF-8. It says, in short, "be careful"!!! Sigh...
Is the situation somehow improved in Unicode 5.0?
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: UCS-2BE, Andreas Schwab, 2006/09/01
- Re: UCS-2BE, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/09/01
- Re: UCS-2BE, Kenichi Handa, 2006/09/01
- Re: UCS-2BE, Andreas Schwab, 2006/09/01
- Re: UCS-2BE,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: UCS-2BE, Stefan Monnier, 2006/09/01
- Re: UCS-2BE, Juri Linkov, 2006/09/01
- Re: UCS-2BE, Kenichi Handa, 2006/09/01