[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nested sit-for's
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Nested sit-for's |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:05:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
>> IIUC, the recent addition of current-idle-time by RMS was supposed to
>> fix the sit-for in jit-lock problem in a different way. But so far,
>> RMS' changes to jit-lock have not been installed... What's up???
>
> IIUC, `current-idle-time' would permit to replace the ugliness of my
> `run-at-time' with yet another `run-with-idle-timer'. Hopefully.
Sounds plausible. So I hope RMS will commit his jit-lock fix soon!
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Nested sit-for's, (continued)
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/17
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/18
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/20
- Re: Nested sit-for's,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Kim F. Storm, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, martin rudalics, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Stefan Monnier, 2006/08/21
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Richard Stallman, 2006/08/22
- Re: Nested sit-for's, Chong Yidong, 2006/08/17
- RE: Nested sit-for's, Drew Adams, 2006/08/17