[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: safe_call1 considered harmful
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: safe_call1 considered harmful |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Jul 2006 14:14:00 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> We can change tar-mode/arc-mode/jka-compr to call
> find-operation-coding-system with full number of arguments
> plus the extra argument BUFFER.
> I'd rather leave it alone.
If you think the backward incompatible problem raised by the
current code is not that a big problem, I don't argue
anymore. Shall I install this change in etc/NEWS?
*** NEWS 31 Jul 2006 09:41:07 +0900 1.1382
--- NEWS 31 Jul 2006 14:08:58 +0900
***************
*** 3661,3668 ****
* Incompatible Lisp Changes in Emacs 22.1
! ** The function find-operation-coding-system accepts a cons (FILENAME
! . BUFFER) in an argument correponding to the target.
---
** The variables post-command-idle-hook and post-command-idle-delay have
--- 3661,3670 ----
* Incompatible Lisp Changes in Emacs 22.1
! ** The function find-operation-coding-system may be called with a cons
! (FILENAME . BUFFER) in the second argument if the first argument
! OPERATION is `insert-file-contents', and thus a function registered in
! `file-coding-system-alist' is also called with such an argument.
---
** The variables post-command-idle-hook and post-command-idle-delay have
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, (continued)
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/21
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/07/21
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/21
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/23
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/24
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/30
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/31
- Re: safe_call1 considered harmful, Kenichi Handa, 2006/07/31