[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange eval-after-load
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Strange eval-after-load |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Jul 2006 16:52:53 -0400 |
I'm sure this isn't the only such example. As a more general solution
(with the idea coming from David Kastrup), how about each "utility"
library having an initialisation hook, along the lines of
c-initialization-hook?
This is a good solution, but since it is a certain amount of work to
set this up in each package, we do it only for the packages that need
it.
- Re: Hi, I'm back! + Re: Strange eval-after-load, (continued)
- Re: Hi, I'm back! + Re: Strange eval-after-load, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/07/02
- Re: Hi, I'm back! + Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/02
- Re: Hi, I'm back! + Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Michael Albinus, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, John Paul Wallington, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Johan Bockgård, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Bob Rogers, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/07/05
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/05
Re: Hi, I'm back! + Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/02
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Richard Stallman, 2006/07/03
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/07/04
- Re: Strange eval-after-load, David Kastrup, 2006/07/04