[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience
From: |
Sam Steingold |
Subject: |
Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Jun 2006 08:50:32 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> * Richard Stallman <address@hidden> [2006-06-05 22:06:18 -0400]:
>
> when pop-up-frames is customized to t, the frames proliferate without
> end and have to be explicitly deleted.
> e.g., C-x m (`compose-mail') now creates a new frame that does not go
> away automatically when I hit C-c C-c (`message-send-and-exit').
>
> That is what pop-up-frames does.
I know, and this is not what a user expects: if a task (C-x m or
completion or whatever) has created a frame, it should delete it when
done.
this is what happens when tasks create windows, this is what should
happen when they create frames.
--
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) on Fedora Core release 5 (Bordeaux)
http://honestreporting.com http://mideasttruth.com http://truepeace.org
http://iris.org.il http://memri.org http://camera.org http://dhimmi.com
Between grand theft and a legal fee, there only stands a law degree.
- RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience, (continued)
- RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Drew Adams, 2006/06/05
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/06/05
- RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Drew Adams, 2006/06/05
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Sam Steingold, 2006/06/05
- RE: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Drew Adams, 2006/06/06
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/06
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, John S. Yates, Jr., 2006/06/06
Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Sam Steingold, 2006/06/05
Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience, Richard Stallman, 2006/06/05
- Re: pop-up-frames inconvenience,
Sam Steingold <=