[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces |
Date: |
Mon, 22 May 2006 19:43:58 -0500 (CDT) |
Drew Adams wrote:
OK. I pared it down a bit to send along, and then I tried it in emacs -q.
Result: I do not see the huge slowdown in emacs -q. So, there must be
somthing else that I'm doing in my own environment.
Anything suspicious on {pre,post}-command-hook?
Sincerely,
Luc.
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, (continued)
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/22
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/22
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/22
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/22
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/05/22
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/22
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/22
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/25
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/23
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/23
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/23
- RE: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Drew Adams, 2006/05/23
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/23
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/23
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/24
- Re: Q on performance with 10000 faces, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/24