[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex |
Date: |
Sat, 20 May 2006 12:55:00 -0500 |
Yes. Or, better, just "make HTML" to produce HTML versions of _all_
the manuals. And similarly for XML, DocBook, and PDF.
We added html/ps/pdf targets in standards.texi a while ago. They'll be
supported in the next version of Automake. It would be good to add
those to the Emacs Makefiles.
The consensus was not to add (Texinfo)XML and DocBook targets, since
they are far less widely used. Among other reasons, which are vague in
my memory at this point.
If you feel like adding targets for them too, though, I see no harm in
it -- personally, it's not something I would see as a high priority.
- ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/17
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/17
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/18
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/18
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/18
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/18
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/20
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/20
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/21
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/22
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Karl Berry, 2006/05/19
- Re: ifinfo vs ifnottex, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/05/19