Re: emacs doc changes

[Ted Zlatanov]

On 19 Apr 2006, address@hidden wrote:

> Is there a reason not to use unified diffs ("diff -u") when
> available?  Of course, not all diff programs can provide them, but
> GNU diff does, and patch understands them just as well, and I find
> it quite more human-readable (if I consider myself representative
> for a human, that is).

RMS has asked me for context diffs before, so I'm guessing unified
patches are less useful to Emacs maintainers...  I can provide -u as
well, since I would just do "cvs diff -u" instead of "cvs diff -c".

Ted