[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Macro vs Function
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Macro vs Function |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2006 13:14:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Herbert Euler" <address@hidden> writes:
> Why does (f) in this example not get evaluated?
Because the point of a macro is that you can transform the arguments into
a new form to be evaluated.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, David Kastrup, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, David Kastrup, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, David Kastrup, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, David Kastrup, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, David Kastrup, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Stuart D. Herring, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, David Kastrup, 2006/04/12
- Re: Macro vs Function, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/12