[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 18:50:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> It cannot possibly be worse than the current abuse of the
> post-command-hook
> to do all sorts of things that would be better done by specific hooks
> like:
>
>
> post-switch-buffer-hook (when last command switched buffers)
> post-switch-window-hook (when last command switched windows)
> post-modify-buffer-hook (when last command modified selected buffer)
>
> Yes it can be worse. With post-command-hook, things may happen while
> a certain buffer is current, but switching away and back has no effect
> on them.
I think I have expressed myself unclearly.
The above hooks should not be called on-the-fly, but be executed just
ONCE (if applicable) _after_ running post-command-hook.
It would provide a safe way for code to do special things when the _user_
switches buffers or windows or modifies a buffer.
>
> Please consider the issue closed.
Ok.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow, (continued)
- Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow, Miles Bader, 2006/03/23
- Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/27
- Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/23
- Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow, Kim F. Storm, 2006/03/23
- Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow, Nick Roberts, 2006/03/23
Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/21
Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow, Kim F. Storm, 2006/03/21
Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/22
Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow,
Kim F. Storm <=
Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/23