[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: defvars at compile time
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: defvars at compile time |
|
Date: |
Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:32:35 -0500 |
> Funny name. Seems like value-if-bound would be more accurate.
Yeah. Or "bound-value".
The name was not chosen carefully because this was not intended as
an advertised facility.
If we want to make it one, I suggest the name symbol-value-safe. Like
car-safe.
- Re: New GNOME icons, (continued)
Re: New GNOME icons, Bill Wohler, 2006/03/10
Re: New GNOME icons, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2006/03/13
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: defvars at compile time, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2006/03/15
- Re: defvars at compile time, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/03/16
- Re: defvars at compile time, Johan Bockgård, 2006/03/16
- Re: defvars at compile time, Bill Wohler, 2006/03/16
- Re: defvars at compile time, Miles Bader, 2006/03/16
- Re: defvars at compile time,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: defvars at compile time, Stefan Monnier, 2006/03/20
Re: defvars at compile time, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2006/03/21
Re: defvars at compile time, Stefan Monnier, 2006/03/27
Re: defvars at compile time, Bill Wohler, 2006/03/27
Re: defvars at compile time, Stefan Monnier, 2006/03/28
Re: defvars at compile time, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/29
Re: defvars at compile time, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/28