[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: latexenc and `TeX-master'
From: |
David Reitter |
Subject: |
Re: latexenc and `TeX-master' |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:54:00 +0000 |
On 22 Jan 2006, at 17:21, Arne Jørgensen wrote:
Arne Jørgensen <address@hidden> writes:
But it is probably better to check if the file is a regular and then
also check if it is actually readable.
Readability is already checked later in the code. Checking whether the
file is a regular file is also better checked at that point.
yes, I agree. The second change (below) should catch all other cases.
*** latexenc.el 02 Dec 2005 13:24:11 +0000 1.11
--- latexenc.el 22 Jan 2006 08:52:12 +0000
***************
*** 174,180 ****
(find-file-noselect latexenc-main-file t)))
(coding-system-base ;Disregard the EOL part of
the CS.
(with-current-buffer latexenc-main-buffer
! (or coding-system-for-write buffer-file-coding-
system))))
'undecided))))
'undecided))
--- 175,183 ----
(find-file-noselect latexenc-main-file t)))
(coding-system-base ;Disregard the EOL part of
the CS.
(with-current-buffer latexenc-main-buffer
! (or coding-system-for-write
! buffer-file-coding-system
! 'undecided))))
'undecided))))
'undecided))
Re: latexenc and `TeX-master', Arne Jørgensen, 2006/01/22