[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: display-buffer
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: display-buffer |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:38:25 +1300 |
> No its the same or at least I can't any difference. My window
> manager is metacity and it works/is configured for click-to-focus
> (not a lisp variable?) However focus-follows-mouse is t, but I
> guess Emacs can't overrule the window manager.
>
> I have not been following this thread. But unless I misunderstand the
> above, your window manager is configured for click-to-focus and you
> have focus-follows-mouse set to t. If so, you are unavoidably going to
> experience some buggish feeling behavior. The purpose of
> `focus-follows-mouse' is to inform Emacs how your window manager
> behaves. Its purpose is not to have Emacs try to overrule your window
> manager. If I understood you correctly, you should set
> focus-follows-mouse set to nil.
I can't see any difference in behaviour when focus-follows-mouse is t or nil.
If I configure metacity so that focus follows mouse, then display-buffer and
other lisp commands seem to behave as before, although clearly focus now
changes if I move the mouse from one Emacs frame to another.
Nick
- display-buffer, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/02
- RE: display-buffer, Drew Adams, 2005/11/03
- Re: display-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/03
- RE: display-buffer, Drew Adams, 2005/11/03
- Re: display-buffer, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/03
- Re: display-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2005/11/03
- Re: display-buffer, Nick Roberts, 2005/11/05
- Re: display-buffer, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/11/05
- Re: display-buffer,
Nick Roberts <=
Re: display-buffer, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/11/03