[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64 |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 12:07:50 +0200 |
> From: "Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:09:06 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > Yes, and they both are almost certainly needed. The reason is that
> > some functions in libgcc.a call functions from libc.a, and some libc.a
> > functions need functions from libgcc.a. Since most versions of ld are
> > one-pass linkers, you need to mention -lgcc twice, or else risk
> > getting unresolved externals.
>
> Someone should add a comment above that line
> to explain this.
I don't object to such a comment, of course, but I thought this was
common knowledge. E.g., anyone who has ever invoked GCC with the -v
option to build a C program already knows that GCC mentions -lgcc
twice on the linker's command line.
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, (continued)
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Frank Schmitt, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/27
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Frank Schmitt, 2005/10/28
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/28
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/28
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/10/29
- Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/29
Re: RFC: Support for FreeBSD/amd64, Dryice Liu, 2005/10/27