Re: mh-e/mh-loaddefs.el removed from CVS

[Bill Wohler]

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:

> > From: Jason Rumney <address@hidden>
> > Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:23:04 +0100
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > 
> > Bill Wohler <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > >>> The lisp/Makefile.in has been changed to regenerate
> > >>> mh-e/mh-loaddefs.el, but the corresponding lisp/makefile.w32-in remain
> > >>> unchanged. Is that ok?
> > >
> > > Done. Can someone please take care of verifying the change and
> > > implementing any "tricky bits" that Juanma mentioned?
> > 
> > I have implemented the "tricky bits" and tested them on
> > CMD.EXE.
> 
> And I tested them with a Unixy shell, and it works.  (Needed to make a
> small change to avoid same-file warnings, though.)

Thank you both!

-- 
Bill Wohler <address@hidden>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.