[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: flyspell bug
From: |
Slawomir Nowaczyk |
Subject: |
Re: flyspell bug |
Date: |
Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:10:39 +0200 |
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:08:27 -0400
"Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden> wrote:
#> It seems to me that there is no reason for flyspell.el to check the
#> buffer-local specifications every time it checks or corrects a word;
#> doing this when the user enables Flyspell mode ought to be enough.
Not really. I work sometimes with several buffers where each is
written in a different language. After your change, the ispell
dictionary isn't automatically adjusted anymore.
I need to manually run, for example, ispell-word in order for
ispell/flyspell to notice it should change language/dictionary.
It seems, therefore, that flyspell should read buffer local
specifications at least after changing buffers.
#> Which suggests making this change. Does it fix the problem?
Your change does seem to fix the problem with transient mark mode for
me, though.
--
Best wishes,
Slawomir Nowaczyk
( address@hidden )
The first myth of good management is that it exists.
- flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug,
Slawomir Nowaczyk <=
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/02
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Kim F. Storm, 2005/10/04
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/04
- Re: flyspell bug, David Kastrup, 2005/10/05
- Re: flyspell bug, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/03
- Re: flyspell bug, Slawomir Nowaczyk, 2005/10/05