[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 19:55:45 -0400 |
Well, I think then it should be left to the package maintainer to
decide whether he wants to maintain a common XEmacs/Emacs version, or
just maintain the version for Emacs.
The author is Bill Perry, but ISTR he is not in contact with us
any more. When is the last time we heard from him?
If he is indeed still involved, then we can ask him what he prefers.
If not, we should put "Maintainer: FSF" in these files.
- Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?, CHENG Gao, 2005/09/25
- Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/09/26
- Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?, Cheng Gao, 2005/09/26
- Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/09/26
- Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?, Cheng Gao, 2005/09/26
- Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?, David Kastrup, 2005/09/27
- Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/09/27
- Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/09/27
Re: Should xemacs feature test be removed from url package?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/09/26