Re: emacs & MAXPATHLEN

[Juanma Barranquero]

On 8/4/05, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

> But in my
> reply to Sascha I pointed out to him that his way of applying the term
> "a program" to Linux would fit GNU/Linux quite as well.  Which did not
> really serve to render the view he claimed to support more plausible.

Oh, I think yes, it does make it more plausible. I call Emacs "a
program", irrespective of whether it includes other, subservient
programs (like movemail, emacsclient, etc.). I don't think the
definition of "program" is as monolithic as you make it sound.

-- 
                    /L/e/k/t/u