[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *"
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *" |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 20:09:15 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> On 7/29/05, Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Such a cosmetic change will cause lots of conflicts in
>> emacs-unicode branch. Could you please postpone it until
>> emacs-unicode is merged?
> Sure.
> And BTW, when will it be merged? Soon after the 22.1 release?
Yes, that is what I heard from Richard ... long ago.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", (continued)
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Kenichi Handa, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Miles Bader, 2005/07/28
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Miles Bader, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Miles Bader, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/29
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *",
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *", Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/29