[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Editing exportet registry files
From: |
Gaëtan LEURENT |
Subject: |
Re: Editing exportet registry files |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:52:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (usg-unix-v) |
Juanma Barranquero wrote on 01 Jul 2005 20:01:14 +0200:
>> Shouldn't the utf-x files with signature be quite in front of the list
>> of detected coding systems? I mean, that's what the signature is good
>> for in the first place, right?
>
> Well, yeah, but FF and FE *are* valid characters in many encodings.
> Latin encodings for most european language environments are going to
> be higher up the priority list, for example.
Well, a Latin-1 file is quite unlikely to begin with « þÿ » or « ÿþ ».
> Are there environments (operating systems, language environments,
> whatever) where utf-16 is the norm?
I think it's the case on MS Windows.
--
Gaëtan LEURENT
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, gritsch, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Miles Bader, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, David Kastrup, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Jason Rumney, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/01
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Andreas Schwab, 2005/07/02
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/07/02
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Gaëtan LEURENT, 2005/07/03
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Jason Rumney, 2005/07/03
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, David Kastrup, 2005/07/03
- Re: Editing exportet registry files, Kaloian Doganov, 2005/07/04
- Coding system priority (was: Editing exportet registry files), Gaëtan LEURENT, 2005/07/03