[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GC
|
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: GC |
|
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:29:45 -0400 |
I'd had already suggested a change to grow gc-cons-threshold as the heap
grows (a long time ago), and I see that XEmacs's gc-cons-percentage is
clean interface to such a feature. I think we should introduce this
variable and give it a good non-zero default value.
I agree. Would you like to do it?
- Re: GC, (continued)
- Re: GC, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/27
- Re: GC, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Miles Bader, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Gaëtan LEURENT, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/28
- Re: GC,
Richard M. Stallman <=
Re: lists.texi, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/18