[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: File menu changes (suggestions)
From: |
John S. Yates, Jr. |
Subject: |
Re: File menu changes (suggestions) |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 06:05:16 -0400 |
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 01:28:53 -0400, you wrote:
>> People pointed out that "New File" might be confusing
>> since it does not in fact make a new file. I think the name
>> "Visit New File" will help show that this isn't the same as the usual
>> "New File" operation.
>
>Rather than change menu entries's names to less "standard" ones, we should
>change their behavior to better match what users expect.
Exactly the attitude I advocate.
>E.g. find-file might require confirmation before opening
>a non-existent file. I'll love such a new feature, seeing how often I do
>"C-x C-f emacs/src/rege TAB RET" only to find myself in "regexp." rather
>than in the "regexp.c" that I intended to open.
I love it.
>As for the "New File" entry, there are several options. One is to just
>create a new buffer called "New Document" and not attached to any file.
>This mimicks many "CUA-style" systems. It sucks because it does give us
>a chance to choose a good minor mode, and because we won't be able to
>autosave the file [this latter point could be fixed, of course].
(Miss "not" near end of 3rd line?)
>Another option is to prompt for a file name and require confirmation if the
>file already exists. It's a slightly different behavior than those other
>"CUA-style" systems, but unsuspecting users should hopefully not find
>it confusing, which is all we really care about.
Yes! A very nice solution. It alters the timing of when the user
supplies the ultimate file-name but preserves essential Emacs models.
In fact I suspect that one would be very hard put to find a user of a
CUA-like system who would argue that giving new documents an initial,
application-generated name and path, only to later have to remember
to use SaveAs.. instead of Save is a virtue to be preserved. Thus I
believe that Stefan's suggestion would be quite palatable to the CUA
community.
>I guess I'm just repeating what Miles and Eli have said.
No. You have made a concrete suggestion that has not been aired
before. I heartily endorse both the suggestion and your attitude
of how to respond to the not-yet-Emacs-users community.
/john
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), (continued)
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/28
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Lennart Borgman, 2005/06/28
- Sticks! (was: File menu changes (suggestions)), Drew Adams, 2005/06/29
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/28
- Re: File menu changes (suggestions), David Kastrup, 2005/06/28
Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/28
RE: File menu changes (suggestions), Drew Adams, 2005/06/28
Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Lennart Borgman, 2005/06/28
Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/28
Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Miles Bader, 2005/06/28
Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/29
Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Miles Bader, 2005/06/29
Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/29
Re: File menu changes (suggestions), Miles Bader, 2005/06/29