Re: Fundamental mode.

[Juanma Barranquero]

> The latter also introduces
> fundamental-mode-hook, of course.  I see no problem with that, but I'm
> a bit surprised it hasn't been done already.  (So I suspect there is
> some reason for not running fundamental-mode-hook.)

Probably no one needed fundamental-mode-hook before. (run-mode-hooks
'fundamental-mode-hook) seems reasonable IMO.

-- 
                    /L/e/k/t/u