[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Jun 2005 01:08:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> This `evaporate' idea is a good one, but I agree with the person
> who said that the indication should go at the end, not the beginning,
> of the return value. The value returned by `match-data' has
> a defined format and this should not be broken.
I have installed the second version of the patch, adding the RESEAT arg to
match-data and set-match-data.
I extended the patch so that specifying `evaporate' for RESEAT will
free the markers immediately.
I changed save-match-data to use evaporate, but the change to replace.el
only passes `t' to match-data -- maybe it could pass evaporate as well.
David?
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el, (continued)
- Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/07
- Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el, David Kastrup, 2005/06/07
- Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/08
- Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el, Kim F. Storm, 2005/06/07
- Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/07
- Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/08
- Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/07
Re: Inefficient code in reftex-index.el, Carsten Dominik, 2005/06/06