[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs -Q not documented
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: emacs -Q not documented |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:14:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> It is intended to be an option turn off all "extra features".
>
> On what criterion are these features "extra"?
They are various "decorations" to the basic Emacs frame or
functionality.
Turning them off, skips over a fairly big (and complex) part of
internal redisplay code (e.g. building menu and tool bars which may
run quite a deal of lisp code).
>
> But most important, running emacs -Q when debugging redisplay problems
> makes it much easier to know what's going on.
>
> Why does the blinking cursor relate to this?
It means running timers and async Lisp code, and triggers redisplay
which may influense how a bug in redisplay manifests itself on the
screen.
Furthermore, it means you cannot just put a breakpoint on (or anywhere
inside) redisplay_internal and then execute some code to generate a
specific error... The blinking cursor timer will trigger that
breakpoint every second, making it practically impossible to
debug such problems.
The -Q option has saved me many hours debugging rediplay problems!
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, (continued)
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Miles Bader, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/05
- Re: emacs -Q not documented,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Nick Roberts, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Kim F. Storm, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Andreas Schwab, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, David Kastrup, 2005/04/06
- Re: emacs -Q not documented, Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/06