Re: emacs -Q not documented

[Kim F. Storm]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> On Apr 5, 2005 4:31 PM, Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Just because we cannot find a long name for it -- that's silly, IMO!
>> Please keep the option.  It serves the purpose it was added for very
>> well!!
>
> There seems no reason not to split it into a couple of more coherent
> options though.

So instead of "emacs -Q" I have to ask a user to please try
"emacs -q -A -T --no-bla-bla -V --no-blinking-cursor"

As I said: 

Please keep the option.  It serves the purpose it was added for very well!!

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk