[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 19:47:27 +0900 |
> My proposal for an C-x ` alternative would be C-x ? which appears to
> be free at the moment. ? is a frequent character in all languages I
> know, and so it should be more accessible than ` on most keyboards.
> It also is connotated with "error" somewhat.
That's really no better than C-x ` so what's the point (the "also
connotated with error" thing is so tenuous as to be worthless)?
Either we should change it to something good, or just leave it as is
until the next release.
[My personal binding for next-error is `C-x C-n', which just
completely rocks; but Juri's suggestion is pretty good too.]
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, (continued)
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Jari Aalto, 2005/03/02
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/02
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Jari Aalto, 2005/03/03
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Juri Linkov, 2005/03/09
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2005/03/09
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/09
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, David Kastrup, 2005/03/09
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/09
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Piet van Oostrum, 2005/03/10
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Miles Bader, 2005/03/10
- Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/10
- M-g binding in Gnus (was: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line), Reiner Steib, 2005/03/10
- Re: M-g binding in Gnus, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/10
- Re: M-g binding in Gnus, Reiner Steib, 2005/03/10
- Re: M-g binding in Gnus, Kim F. Storm, 2005/03/10
Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line, Richard Stallman, 2005/03/09