[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: backup method
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: backup method |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:20:40 +0900 |
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:45:18 -0600 (CST), Luc Teirlinck
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Han Boetes wrote:
>
> So I would like to suggest to make backup by copying the default.
>
> I agree. Backup by renaming is a very confusing default.
No it's not. It's by _far_ the most natural way to do it.
> I had to
> change it instantly after I first started using Emacs. I had a
> process appending to a file with auto-revert enabled. I edited the
> file and saved my changes. The process started appending to the
> backup file. Very confusing
The problem here is that you're doing something Very Weird: editing
and saving a file currently being written by a process is _not_ a
common thing to do, for good reason -- no matter what your editor
does, it's pretty much random luck whether the right thing happens or
not.
Backup-by-renaming is the best method for general use; there are
specific exceptional cases where it doesn't work well. If some of
these exceptional cases are easy to detect, Emacs should detect them.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- backup method, Han Boetes, 2005/01/26
- Re: backup method, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/01/26
- Re: backup method,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: backup method, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/01/26
- Re: backup method, Han Boetes, 2005/01/26
- Re: backup method, Richard Stallman, 2005/01/27
- Re: backup method, Han Boetes, 2005/01/27
- Re: backup method, Richard Stallman, 2005/01/28
- Re: backup method, Han Boetes, 2005/01/29
- Re: backup method, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/01/29
- Re: backup method, Stefan Monnier, 2005/01/29
- Re: backup method, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/01/29
- Re: backup method, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/01/29