[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: syntax-after
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: syntax-after |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2004 11:27:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> The raw representation (i.e. the cons cell representation used inside
>> the chartables used as syntax-tables) does appear at various places
>> (it appears if you do (aref <syntax-table> ?\[) or if you lookup the
>> `syntax-table' text-property, it is used in
>> font-lock-syntactic-keywords for code that needs to work on Emacs-20,
>> ...) and it seems difficult to get rid of it now; so no, you haven't
>> reduced the number of representations.
>
>> I intended this change as a step towards reducing the mess
>> of these different representations. However, you've convinced
>> me the change should be undone.
>
>> I don't know if I will have net access this week--could you please
>> undo it?
>
> Done,
>
It seems you forgot to undo changes to etc/NEWS and syntax.texi...
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- syntax-after, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/11
- Re: syntax-after, Juri Linkov, 2004/11/11
- Re: syntax-after, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/12
- Re: syntax-after, Juri Linkov, 2004/11/13
- Re: syntax-after, Stefan, 2004/11/13
- Re: syntax-after, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/16
- Re: syntax-after, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/22
- Re: syntax-after,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: syntax-after, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/22
- Re: syntax-after, Juri Linkov, 2004/11/23
- Re: syntax-after, Stefan, 2004/11/23
- Re: syntax-after, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/23