[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: buff-menu.el header line
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: buff-menu.el header line |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:04:05 -0500 |
> The use of the intangibility property in this instance is
> inappropriate, because it has absolutely no benefit whatsoever to the
> user and has several negative consequences. One of the main reasons
> to set `buffer-menu-use-header-line' to nil is to be able to move into
> that text. But this is exactly what the intangibility property wants
> to prevent. Why? If the user does C-f at the beginning of a buffer,
> it is with the purpose of moving to the right, not to move to the
> third line. The latter behavior is extremely surprising (and
undesirable).
I agree, there is no reason for that text to be intangible. I plan to
take that out, unless someone shows me a good reason to leave it in.
- Re: buff-menu.el header line, (continued)
- Re: buff-menu.el header line, Andreas Schwab, 2004/11/18
- Re: buff-menu.el header line, Kim F. Storm, 2004/11/19
- Re: buff-menu.el header line, Stephan Stahl, 2004/11/19
- Re: buff-menu.el header line, David Kastrup, 2004/11/19
- Re: buff-menu.el header line, Andreas Schwab, 2004/11/19
- Re: buff-menu.el header line, Stephan Stahl, 2004/11/19
- RE: buff-menu.el header line, Drew Adams, 2004/11/19
- Re: buff-menu.el header line, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/11/19
- call-interactively: completion broken, Robert J. Chassell, 2004/11/21
- Re: call-interactively: completion broken, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/11/21
- Re: buff-menu.el header line,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: buff-menu.el header line, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/19