[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: printing.el again
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: printing.el again |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:03:56 -0500 |
> Yes, that's another solution. I find CL's `flet' much more elegant, tho.
It is ok to use the CL macros in general, but the use of flet on a
function that is not internal to your package is really un-cool.
Using flet on a function name internal to your package is ok, but I
think that if you have a value that varies, it is better to use a
variable name for it.
- Re: printing.el again, (continued)
- Re: printing.el again, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2004/11/15
- Re: printing.el again, Stefan, 2004/11/15
- Re: printing.el again, Luc Teirlinck, 2004/11/15
- Re: printing.el again, Ralf Angeli, 2004/11/16
- Re: printing.el again, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/16
- Re: printing.el again, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2004/11/17
- Re: printing.el again, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: printing.el again, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2004/11/18
- Re: printing.el again, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: printing.el again, Richard Stallman, 2004/11/19
- Re: printing.el again,
Richard Stallman <=