Re: Problem with Gnus

[Reiner Steib]

On Sun, Oct 24 2004, Kevin Greiner wrote:

> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
>> On Sat, Oct 23 2004, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>>> Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hm, as the new agent code is in the v5-10 branch too and we intend to
>>>> release 5.10.7 from this branch some day, shouldn't the upgrade
>>>> functions be assigned to 5.10.7 *and* we should bump the version in
>>>> the v5-10 branch to 5.10.7 [1] now?  Else people using the v5-10
>>>> branch outside of CVS-Emacs won't get the proper upgrade functions
>>>> (though I doubt that many people use this branch).

(In the meantime, I heard of some people using the v5-10 branch.)

>>>> Lars, WDYT?
>>>
>>> Hm...  why is the new agent code in 5.10?  There really shouldn't be
>>> anything there except bug fixes, right?
>>
>> Kevin's changes in 5.10 should fix several bugs in the agent code of
>> 5.10.6.  (I don't know the details since I don't use the agent.)
[...]
> There has only been one truely new agent feature added to No Gnus.
> That feature was NOT added to the v5-10 branch.  Of the code that was
> checked in, the only thing that was not clearly an agent bug fix was
> the gnus version upgrade changes.

Lars, is it okay to bump the version in v5-10 branch to 5.10.7 and
assign the agent upgrade functions to 5.10.7?

Bye, Reiner.
-- 
       ,,,
      (o o)
---ooO-(_)-Ooo---  |  PGP key available  |  http://rsteib.home.pages.de/