[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on display.texi
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Comments on display.texi |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:48:30 -0400 |
I still have problems envisioning anybody using more than a few
bitmaps in any mode (ok, a mode which shows line numbers in
the fringe would probably use a couple of 100s).
Currently, the only package using bitmaps is gdb-ui -- and it uses
just ONE.
Where are bitmap indices stored? How many places will Emacs try to
store them?
There are several places in the code which uses a static allocation
based on the max number of bitmaps. Of course they can be made
dynamic, but that would be unnecessary, we could agree on a limit of
4095 for 21.4. WDYT?
One of the GNU coding standards is to avoid fixed-allocated tables.
Why not malloc them? You can start them at length 20 and realloc them
if they are ever exceeded.
- Comments on display.texi, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/25
- Re: Comments on display.texi, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/26
- Re: Comments on display.texi, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/26
- Re: Comments on display.texi, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/27
- Re: Comments on display.texi, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/28
- Re: Comments on display.texi,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Comments on display.texi, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/29
- Re: Comments on display.texi, David Kastrup, 2004/09/29